Modern Constitutional and Bioethical Values: Legal and Ethical Aspects

Scientific progress and advances in biotechnology continue to raise controversial questions about human nature, rights, and dignity. The rapid development of modern biomedical technologies draws the authors’ attention to relationships between constitutional and bioethical values. Technological advances, such as CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, the artificial creation of human skin, tissues, and organs, the latest reproductive technologies, the use of artificial intelligence in medicine, etc., – altogether underscore the importance of revisiting the ethical boundaries of permissible intervention in human nature and the need to update theoretical and legal approaches to the protection of human dignity, life, and personal autonomy.

In this work, we aim to identify the key bioethical principles and analyze the nature of human dignity as a unifying category that forms the basis of bioconstitutionalism. The need for new legal approaches to the regulation of biomedical technologies is justified, and the role of legal and cross-cultural aspects in ensuring the balanced development of technologies and the protection of human rights is emphasized. In conclusion, the need to develop new conceptual foundations for the regulation of the biotechnological sphere in the context of technological progress is emphasized.

1. Andorno, R. (2014). Human Dignity and Human Rights. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds.). Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_66

2. Avakyan, S.A. (2000). Constitution of Russia: nature, evolution, modernity. Moscow: Rossijskij Yuridicheskij Izdatel'skij Dom. (In Russ.).

3. Belyavsky, A.V., Pridvorov, N.A. (1977). Personal dignity and socialist law. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya Literatura Publ. (In Russ.).

4. Berg, L.N., Lisachenko, A.V. (2025). Legal support for the safe use of genetic and genomic information. Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).

5. Bondar, N.S. (2009). Constitutional Values – a Category of Current Law (in the Context of the Practice of the Constitutional Court of Russia). Journal of Constitutional Justice, (6), 1–11. (In Russ.).

6. Bondar, N.S. (2013). Russian constitutional law in an axiological aspect: as a legal sector, a legal science and an educational discipline. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (11), 4–13. (In Russ.).

7. Bondar, N.S. (2017). Сonstitutional category of human dignity in value-based measurement: theory and court practice. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (4), 19–31. (In Russ.).

8. Bremner, A. (2019). Roaming Charges: Moments of Dignity: Mekong River. European Journal of International Law, 30(3), 929–932. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz048

9. Charles, J.D. (2007). The Natural Law and Human Dignity: Reaffirming Ethical First Things. Liberty University Law Review, 2 (3), art. 2. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=lu_law_review

10. Demidov, Yu.A. (1975). Social Value and Assessment in Criminal Law. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literature Publ. (In Russ.).

11. Düwell, M., Braarvig, J., Brownsword, R., Mieth, D. (eds.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511979033

12. Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vkt

13. Etinson, A. (2020). What’s so special about human dignity? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 48(4), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12175

14. Gadzhiev, G.A. (2013). Ontology of Law (a Study of the Legal Concept of Reality). Moscow: Norma: Infra-M Publ. (In Russ.).

15. Gisbertz, P. (2018). Overcoming Doctrinal School Thought: A Unifying Approach to Human Dignity. Ratio Juris, 31(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12204

16. Karaseva, I.A. (2014). Competition of Constitutional Values in Russian and European Case Law. Comparative Constitutional Review, (4), 75–85. (In Russ.).

17. Kateb, G. (2011). Human Dignity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

18. Kokotov, A.N. (2014). The Constitutional Principle of Trust in the Practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Comparative Constitutional Review, 5(102), 97–108. (In Russ.).

19. Kravets, I.A. (2025). Bioethical dignity in human rights jurisprudence and in the biolaw system: theoretical and international legal aspects. Comparative Constitutional Review, 34(3), 50–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-50-75

20. Kravets, I.A. (2019). The dignity of the individual in the theory and practice of judicial constitutionalism. Journal of Constitutional Justice, (1), 11–20. (In Russ.).

21. Kravets, I.A. (2020). Homo Dignus in Philosophical and Legal Discourse: Human Dignity and the Philosophy of Constitutionalism. Voprosy Filosofii, (2), 26–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-2-26-37

22. Kravets, I.A. (2022a). Bioconstitutionalism and constitutional bioethics: prospects of constitutionalization of biodiversity and the 2020 constitutional reform. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (5), 11–15. (In Russ.).

23. Kravets, I.A. (2022b). Bioneuroconstitutionalism and Dignity: Theoretical Foundations, Dialogue of Ethical and Legal Requirements and Prospects for Interaction (Part II). Journal of Russian Law, 26(6), 5–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.059

24. Kravets, I.A. (2022c). Constitutional biojurisprudence and the achievement of bioethical well-being (part 1). Comparative Constitutional Review, (2), 16–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2022-2-16-42

25. Kravets, I.A. (2022d). Constitutional biojurisprudence and the achievement of bioethical well-being (part 2). Comparative Constitutional Review, (3), 16–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2022-3-16-32

26. Kravets, I.A. (2023). Bioethical vectors of dignity and cultural diversity in constitutional and international biojurisprudence: prospects for the constitutionalization of biosecurity and the achievement of bioethical well-being. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (1), 7–17. (In Russ.).

27. Kravets, I.A. (2024). Principles of Russian constitutionalism and constitutionalization of the legal order. Moscow: RUSAINS Publ. (In Russ.).

28. Kravets, I.A., Krylatova, I.Yu., Bolkov, M.A. (2022). Actual problems of implementation of modern principles of bioethics and evidence-based medicine: legal, ethical and medical aspects. Tomsk State University Journal, (484), 235–249. (In Russ.).

29. Kruss, V.I. (2007). Russian constitutional axiology: relevance and prospects. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (2), 7–14. (In Russ.).

30. Kruss, V.I. (2016). Constitutionalization of Law: Fundamentals of Theory. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.).

31. Kruss, V.I. (2023). Medical law, constitutional law enforcement and somatic claims. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (4), 8–18. (In Russ.).

32. Kudryavtsev, V.N. (2022). Law, Deed, Responsibility. Reprint of the 1986 edition. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.).

33. Kuznetsov, V.V. (2017). Dignity as a fundamental principle of culture or as a manifestation of the law of the “existential self”. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 90–100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.8309

34. Lagon, M.P., Arend, A.C. (eds.). (2014). Human dignity and the future of global institutions. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book35215

35. Lapteva, L.E. (1997). Political and legal values: history and modernity (symposium). State and Law (7), 84–86. (In Russ.).

36. Libanova, S.E., Bylinkina, E.V. (2020). The relationship between man and the state in the changing postwar world through the prism of eternal values and legal culture. Law & Legislation, (10), 23–29. (In Russ.).

37. Libanova, S.E. (2025). Digitalization and ways to solve the problems of ensuring constitutional values in the aspect of information security. In: Ideological aspects of information security in the context of civilizational contradictions (99–136).. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Law University named after V.F. Yakovlev. (In Russ.).

38. Magadov, Sh.R. (2012). Morality as a constitutional value in the Russian Federation. [Dissertation, Russian University of Cooperation]. Mytishchi. (In Russ.).

39. Maly'j, A.F., Permilovskij, M.S. (2015). Theory of fundamentals of constitutional axiology. Constitutional and municipal law, (4), 3–5. (In Russ.).

40. Mamonov, V.V. (2013). Constitutional Values of Modern Russia. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, (4), 125–132. (In Russ.).

41. Mamut, L.S. (1997). Value as a problem of the science of state. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, (6), 45–55. (In Russ.).

42. Mishina, I.D. (2013). The Sublimating Function of Values in Law: Toward a Problem Statement. Advances in Law Studies, 1(2), 75–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/526

43. Nesmeyanova, S.E. (2007). Judicial practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with comments. Moscow: Prospekt Publ. (In Russ.).

44. Nevinskij, V.V. (2013). The Constitution of the Russian Federation and Dignity of a Person (Recollection of the Future). Constitutional and Municipal Law, (11), 48–54. (In Russ.).

45. Nevinsky, V.V. (ed.), et al. (1999). Human dignity: from the philosophical and legal idea to the constitutional principle of the modern state. Materials of the inter-regional scientific and practical seminar. Barnaul: Publishing House of Altai State University. (In Russ.).

46. Nevinsky, V.V. (2018). Essence of the universalization of constitutional values in modern society. Lex Russica, (11), 106–121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2018.144.11.106-121

47. O’Mahony, C. (2012). There is no such thing as a right to dignity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(2), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos010

48. Orlova, O.V. (2015). Identity is a core value of civil society. State and Law, (6), 76–81. (In Russ.).

49. Paladiev, M.A. (2006). The constitutional human right to honor and dignity (grounds, content, protection). [Dissertation, Samara State University]. Samara. (In Russ.).

50. Permilovsky, M.S. (2012). The Right to a Favorable Environment in the Hierarchy of Constitutional Values. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series «Humanitarian and Social Sciences», (2), 109–113. (In Russ.).

51. Permilovsky, M.S. (2014). The right to a favorable environment as a constitutional value. [Dissertation, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University]. Kazan. (In Russ.).

52. Petrov, V.I., Sedova, N.N. (2002). Practical bioethics: ethical committees in Russia. Moscow: Triumph Publ. (In Russ.).

53. Potter, V.R. (1970). Bioethics, the science of survival. Perspectives in biology and medicine, 14(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1970.0015

54. Potter, V.R. (1971). Bioethics: bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

55. Presnyakov, M.V. (2011). Сonstitutional concept of justice. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, (6), 102–130. (In Russ.).

56. Rabinovich, P.M. (1985). Socialist Law as a Value. Lviv: Higher School. Lviv University Publishing House. (In Russ.).

57. Rawls, J. (2001). The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pncngc

58. Rios Oyola, S.M. (2019). Human dignity and transitional justice. In: The Palgrave encyclopedia of peace and conflict studies (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_56-1

59. Roizman, G.B. (2012). Values in the constitutional law of the Russian Federation. [Dissertation, Chelyabinsk State University]. Chelyabinsk. (In Russ.).

60. Rudinsky, F.M. (1983). Democracy and personal dignity. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).

61. Sayamov, Yu.N. (2020). Bioethics and the global challenges of our time. Documents and reflections. Moscow: Veche Publ. (In Russ.).

62. Sharakshane, S.A. (2006). The essence and meaning of the concept of «personal dignity» in the context of philosophical anthropology. Humane, Social and Economic Sciences, (3), 60–65. (In Russ.).

63. Siluyanova, I.V. (2008). A guide to the ethical and legal foundations of medical activity. Moscow: MEDpress-inform Publ. (In Russ.).

64. Suprun, N.G. (2010). Values-based determination of scientific knowledge: an experience of epistemological analysis. [Dissertation, Magnitogorsk State University]. Magnitogorsk. (In Russ.).

65. Taeva, N.E. (2009). Norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation as a form of expression of social values. Constitutional and municipal law, (5), 2–5. (In Russ.).

66. Umnova, I.A., Stalnova, A.S. (2016). The Constitutional principle of respect for human dignity: general approaches to legal understanding and Russian constitutional practice. Constitutional and Municipal Law, (10), 15–20. (In Russ.).

67. Vitruk, N.V. (2008). Аllegiance to the Constitution. 2nd ed. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice. (In Russ).

68. Vlasova, O.V. (2013). Affirmation of human dignity is the main priority of legal interaction between the authorities and public associations. Law and Politics, (9), 1160–1168. (In Russ.).

69. Waldron, J. (2012). Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o-so/9780199915439.001.0001

70. Waldron, J. (2013). Is dignity the foundation of human rights? Public Law Research Paper №12-73. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196074

71. Wojtyla, K. (1991). Foundations of Ethics. Voprosy Filosofii, (1), 29–61. (In Russ.).

72. Yudin, B.G. (2018). Man: going beyond. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ. (In Russ.).

73. Yudin, B.G. (1992). Social institutionalization of bioethics. In: Malkov S.M., Ogurtsov A.P. (eds.). Bioethics: Problems and Prospects. Collection of articles. Moscow: INFRAN Publ. (In Russ.).

74. Zorkin, V.D. (2008). Values-based approach in constitutional regulation of rights and freedoms. Journal of Russian Law, (12), 3–14. (In Russ.).

75. Zorkin, V.D. (2015). Civilization of Law and the Development of Russia. Moscow: Norma: INFA-M Publ. (In Russ.).