Issues and Prospects for the Development of Biobanks: Trust or Caution in the Academic and Healthcare Community

The article analyzes the major obstacles impeding the development of biobanks in the Russian Federation, outlining future trends in this field. Biobanks form a key component of research infrastructure, serving as repositories for unique biological samples for use by researchers and physicians when investigating disease pathogenesis and developing personalized treatment decisions. The biobanking industry in Russia faces significant challenges, including low awareness among the general population and the professional community directly involved in the interaction with biobanks and donors. In addition, the lack of a coherent legal and regulatory framework, as well as social support measures, creates uncertainty regarding protection of the rights of potential donors and hinders the work of scientific organizations. The results obtained highlight the need for a comprehensive strategy to advance biobanking in Russia. This strategy should encompass the formulation of a legal and regulatory framework to foster public support for this initiative and facilitate a dialogue between the academic community, governmental agencies, and the larger public.

1. Alahmad, G., Al Jumah, M., Dierickx, K. (2015). Confidentiality, informed consent, and children's participation in research involving stored tissue samples: interviews with medical professionals from the Middle East. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 5(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2015.0013

2. Amin, L., Hashim, H., Mahadi, Z., Ismail, K. (2018). Determinants of the willingness to participate in biobanking among Malaysian stakeholders in the Klang Valley. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0619-2

3. Anisimov, S.V., Meshkov, A.N., Glotov, A.S., Borisova, A.L., Balanovsky, O.P., Belyaev, V.E., … Drapkina, O.M. (2021). National Association of Biobanks and Biobanking Specialists: New Community for Promoting Biobanking Ideas and Projects in Russia. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 19(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2020.0049

4. Anisimov, S.V., Akhmerov, T.M., Balanovsky, O.P., Baranich, T.I., Belyaev, V.E., Borisova, A.L., … Sysoeva, V.Yu. (2022). Biobanking. National Guide. Moscow: LLC «Triumph Publishing House». (In Russ.).

5. Barnes, R.O., Shea, K.E., Watson, P.H. (2017). The Canadian Tissue Repository Network Biobank Certification and the College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Programs: Two Strategies for Knowledge Dissemination in Biobanking. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 15(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2016.0021

6. Caixeiro, N.J., Byun, H.L., Descallar, J., Levesque, J.V., de Souza, P., Soon Lee, C. (2016). Health professionals’ opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24, 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.191

7. de Melo-Martín, I., Ortega-Paíno, E. (2024). Biobanking Legislation in Spain: Advancing or Undermining Its Ethical Values?. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 22(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2023.0107

8. Domaradzki, J., Czekajewska, J., Walkowiak, D. (2024). Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland. Medical Science Monitor, 30, e944263-1. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944263

9. Domaradzki, J., Pawlikowski, J. (2019). Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122209

10. Ducournau, P., Strand, R. (2009). Trust, Distrust and Co-production: The Relationship Between Research Biobanks and Donors. In: Solbakk, J., Holm, S., Hofmann, B. (eds.). The Ethics of Research Biobanking (pp. 115–130). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_9

11. Eritsyan, K.Yu., Antonova, N.A. (2019). Social and Psychological Factors of Blood Donors’ Recruitment and Retention: Review of Reviews. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 9(1), 32–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2019.103

12. Garcia, D.L., Bracci, P.M., Guevarra, D.M., Sieffert, N. (2014). International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) tools for the biobanking community. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 12(6), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2014.1264

13. Hawkins, A.K., O’Doherty, K.C. (2010). Biobank governance: a lesson in trust. New Genetics & Society, 29(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2010.507487

14. Kurihara, C., Baroutsou, V., Becker, S., Brun, J., Franke-Bray, B., Carlesi, R., … Kerpel-Fronius, S. (2020). Linking the Declarations of Helsinki and of Taipei: Critical Challenges of Future-Oriented Research Ethics. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, 579714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.579714

15. Leiman, D.A., Lorenzi, N.M., Wyatt, J.C., Doney, A.S., Rosenbloom, S.T. (2008). US and Scottish health professionals’ attitudes toward DNA biobanking. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(3), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2571

16. Leitsalu, L., Alavere, H., Tammesoo, M. L., Leego, E., Metspalu, A. (2015). Linking a Population Biobank with National Health Registries – The Estonian Experience. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 5(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm5020096

17. Lhousni, S., Boulouiz, R., Abda, N., Tajir, M., Bellaoui, M., Ouarzane, M. (2019) Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes and Support of Health Professionals towards Biobanks in Eastern Morocco. Open Journal of Epidemiology, 9(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2019.93016

18. Lipworth, W., Forsyth, R., Kerridge, I. (2011). Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(5), 792–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x

19. Litton J.E. (2018). Launch of an Infrastructure for Health Research: BBMRI-ERIC. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 16(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2018.0027

20. Macheiner, T., Huppertz, B., Sargsyan, K. (2013). Biobanking. Sustainable use of biological resources on the example of the Biobank Graz. Der Pathologe, 34, 366–369. (In German). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-013-1752-7

21. Osiejewicz, J., Zherlitsyn, D.M., Zadorozhna, S.M., Tavolzhanskyi, O.V., Dei, M.O. (2022). National Regulation on Processing Data for Scientific Research Purposes and Biobanking Activities: Reflections on the Experience in Austria. Asian Bioethics Review, 16, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00231-4

22. Persaud, A., Bonham, V.L. (2018). The Role of the Health Care Provider in Building Trust Between Patients and Precision Medicine Research Programs. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(4), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1431327

23. Salokannel, M., Tarkkala, H., Snell, K. (2019). Legacy samples in Finnish biobanks: social and legal issues related to the transfer of old sample collections into biobanks. Human Genetics, 138, 1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-019-02070-0

24. Samuel, G., Broekstra, R., Gille, F., Lucassen, A. (2022). Public Trust and Trustworthiness in Biobanking: the Need for More Reflexivity. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 20(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2021.0109

25. Sarmanaev, S.Kh., Shirokov, A.Yu., Vasiliev, S.A., Osavelyuk, A.M., Zenin, S.S., Suvorov, G.N. (2019). Proposals for Extending the Russian Biobanks Functions to Protect Genomic Information. Lex Russica, (6), 153–160. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.151.6.153-160

26. Tutton, R., Kaye, J., Hoeyer, K. (2004). Governing UK Biobank: the importance of ensuring public trust. Trends in Biotechnology, 22(6), 284–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.007

27. Zhang, Y., Liao, B., Lei, R. (2023). A leap of faith: building the trust in human biobanks. Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1261623. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1261623