<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexgen</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex Genetica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Genetica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">3034-1639</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3034-1647</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МГЮА</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/lexgen-2024-3-4-46-66</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexgen-52</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Lex Genetica: частноправовое измерение</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Lex Genetica: Private-Law Dimension</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Развитие вспомогательной репродукции и концептуальный кризис в установлении материнства</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Development of Assisted Reproduction Technologies and Conceptual Crisis in Establishing Motherhood</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Богданова</surname><given-names>Е. Е.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogdanova</surname><given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Елена Е. Богданова, доктор юридических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры семейного и жилищного права</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elena E. Bogdanova, Doctor of Science (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department of Family and Housing Law</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">eebogdanova@msal.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Богданова Е.Е., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Богданова Е.Е.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bogdanova E.E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/52">https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/52</self-uri><abstract><p>В настоящее время в семейном праве наблюдается кризис в формировании целостной и внутренне непротиворечивой доктрины родительства в целом и материнства в частности. Существуют отдельные элементы научных представлений относительно особенностей установления материнства при применении методов вспомогательной репродукции, которые, однако, не способны выстроить логически последовательную систему выводов и рекомендаций в данной области. Можно признать, что юридическая наука отстает в формировании концепции материнства и вынуждена заимствовать знания других отраслей науки. Цель статьи заключается в подробном исследовании трансформации института материнства в семейном праве под воздействием развития биомедицинских технологий. Юридическая проблема материнства является многоаспектной, в связи с чем для достижения поставленной цели автору необходимо было решить ряд задач, среди которых — установление критериев материнства и определение правового статуса матери; выявление особенностей защиты прав и интересов рожденного ребенка; исследование особенностей влияния методов вспомогательной репродукции при установлении материнства и др. На основе проведенного исследования был сделан вывод о том, что развитие биомедицинских технологий и необходимость учета эволюции института семьи вызывают потребность в новой парадигме родительского правоотношения, в которой права как социального родителя, так и биологического могли бы быть надлежащим образом признаны и определены.</p><p>Таким образом, родительство в целом и материнство в частности представляли бы собой юридически признанные отношения, сформированные в основном из намерения субъектов признавать себя родителем конкретного ребенка.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>At present, family law lacks a coherent doctrine of parenthood, in general, and maternity, in particular. The existing ideas pertaining to issues of establishing legal maternity in the context of assisted reproduction technologies fail to provide a logically consistent system of conclusions and recommendations in this area. The current legal science is lagging in the development of a concept of maternity, having to borrow knowledge from other branches of science.</p><p>In this article, the author examines the ongoing transformation of the institution of maternity in family law under the influence of biomedical technologies. In terms of legal representation, maternity is a multidimensional issue. In this connection, the author formulates a number of research tasks, including establishment of (1) maternity criteria and the legal status of the mother, (2) specific features in the protection of rights and interests of the born child, and (3) influence of assisted reproduction technologies when determining maternity.</p><p>The author concludes that the development of biomedical technologies and evolution of the institution of the family are driving the need for a new paradigm of the parental legal relationship. In this paradigm, the rights of both social parent and biological parent could be properly recognized and defined. Hence, parenthood, in general, and motherhood, in particular, would be a legally recognized relationship formed from the intention of the subjects to recognize themselves as parents of a particular child.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>cемейное право</kwd><kwd>защита прав ребенка</kwd><kwd>правовой статус матери</kwd><kwd>вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии</kwd><kwd>установление материнства</kwd><kwd>суррогатное материнство</kwd><kwd>социальное родительство</kwd><kwd>родительское правоотношение</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>family law</kwd><kwd>protection of children’s rights</kwd><kwd>legal status of the mother</kwd><kwd>assisted reproductive technologies</kwd><kwd>establishment of motherhood</kwd><kwd>surrogacy</kwd><kwd>social parenthood</kwd><kwd>parental legal relations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Акинкина, Я.М. (2020). Принципы «естественного родительства» в современных семьях. Современная зарубежная психология, 9(4), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090409</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akhmatyanova, V.A., Sagitova, I.F. (2018). Auxiliary reproductive technologies in Russia: issues of law. Business. Education. Law. Bulletin of Volgograd Business Institute, (3(44)), 318–323. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2018.44.327</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алборов, С.В. (2019). Правовое и индивидуальное регулирование суррогатного материнства. (Диссертация, Российский государственный университет правосудия, Москва). Москва.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akinkina, Y.M. (2020). Principles of «natural parenthood» in modern families. 9(4), 103–109. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 9(4), 103–109. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090409</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ахматьянова, В.А., Сагитова, И.Ф. (2018). Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии в России: вопросы права. Бизнес. Образование, Право. Вестник Волгоградского института бизнеса, (3(44)), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2018.44.327</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alborov, S.V. (2019). Legal and individual regulation of surrogacy. (Dissertation, Russian State University of Justice, Moscow). Moscow. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Богдан, В.В., Урда, М.Н. (2022). Суррогатное материнство &amp; торговля людьми: межотраслевой конфликт. Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки, (58), 628–657. https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-628-657</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogdan, V.V., Urda, M.N. (2022). Surrogacy &amp; Human Trafficking: Interbranch Conflict. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, (58), 628–657. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-628-657</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Богданова, Е.Е., Белова, Д.А. (2022). Искусственная репродукция человека: поиск оптимальной модели правового регулирования. Москва: Проспект.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogdanova, E.E., Belova, D.A. (2022). Artificial human reproduction: the search for an optimal model of legal regulation. Moscow: Prospect Publ. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дикова, И.А. (2008). К вопросу о субъектах правоотношений в сфере применения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий, Юрист, (11), 46–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernova, J.V., Shpakovskaya, L.L. (2023). A Start in Life: a Sociological Essay on Education, Class Inequality, and Social Exclusion in Russia. St. Petersburg: Press of the European University at St. Petersburg. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кириченко, К.А. (2011) О двух подходах к пониманию правовой сущности вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Медицинское право, 3(37), 35–40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dikova, I.A. (2008). On the issue of subjects of legal relations in the sphere of application of assisted reproductive technologies. Jurist, (11), 46–51. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Комиссарова, Е.Г. (2022). Родительство как семейно-правовое явление: теоретический взгляд на действующие нормативные истоки. Lex russica, 75(6), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.187.6.020-035</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dorfman, D. (2016). Surrogate parenthood: Between genetics and intent. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(2), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мейер, Д.И. (2021). Русское гражданское право. Москва: Статут.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Douglas, T., Devolder, K. (2019). A conception of genetic parenthood. Bioethics, 33(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12493</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Микрюков, В.А. (2021). Аналогия закона и аналогия права в практике разрешения семейно-правовых споров. Москва: Статут.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gostin, L.O. (2001). Surrogacy from the Perspectives of Economic and Civil Liberties. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 17(2), 429–431. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1815</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михневич, А.В., Самойлова, В.В. (2020). Правовые основания применения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий как разновидности биомедицинских технологий. Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук, (5–4), 91–96. Режим доступа: http://intjournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mihnevich2.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Horsey, K. (2017). Challenging presumptions: legal parenthood and surrogacy arrangements. In: Parental Rights and Responsibilities (pp. 287–312). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090085-15</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Момотов, В.В. (2019). Биоэтика в контексте законодательства и правоприменения (суррогатное материнство). Lex russica, (1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.029-039</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khazova, O.A. (2022). The Concept of Social Parenthood in The Context of Russian Family Law. Zakon, (1), 77–86. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Некрасова, Е.В. (2019). Некоторые особенности возникновения родительских прав и обязанностей в странах Европы. Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И. Вернадского. Юридические науки, 5(71)(4), 298–303.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirichenko, K.A. (2011) Two approaches to understanding the legal essence of assisted reproductive technologies. Medical Law, 3(37), 35–40. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Працко, Г.С., Арутюнова, А.А. (2017). К оценке достаточности правового обеспечения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий и суррогатного материнства. Теория и практика общественного развития, (8), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.8.11</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Komissarova, E.G. (2022). Parenthood as a Family Law Phenomenon: a Theoretical Look at the Current Normative Origins. Lex Russica, 75(6), 20–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.187.6.020-035</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свитнев, К.Н. (2008). Нужен ли закон о ВРТ? Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии и их правовое регулирование. В: Национальная идентичность России и демографический кризис. Материалы II Всероссийской научной конференции (Москва, 15 ноября 2007 г.) (c. 819–825). Москва: Научный эксперт.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis, B.C. (2010). Three Lies and a Truth: Adjudicating Maternity in Surrogacy Disputes. Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 10-193. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1661921 Meyer, D.I. (2021). Russian Сivil Law. Moscow: Statut Publ. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Спиридонов, Д.В., Полякова, И.Г. (2024). Феномен отложенного материнства и вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии: социально-экономические и демографические аспекты. Мир России, 33(3), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-3-75-98</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhnevich, A.V., Samoilova, V.V. (2020). Legal grounds for the application of auxiliary reproductive technologies as a variety of biomedical technologies. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, (5-4), 91–96. Available at: http://intjournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mihnevich2.pdf. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ульянова, М.В. (2024). Осуществление семейных прав и исполнение обязанностей в структуре семейного правоотношения. Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки, 1(63), 112– 133. https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2024-63-112-133</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikryukov, V.A. (2021). Analogy of law in the practice of resolving family law disputes. Moscow: Statut Publ. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Усачева, Е.А. (2019). Социальное отцовство (материнство): постановка проблемы. Российский юридический журнал, (6), 115–120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mills, C. (2021). Nuclear families: mitochondrial replacement techniques and the regulation of parenthood. Science, Technology, &amp; Human Values, 46(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920934542</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хазова, О.А. (2022). Понятие социального родительства в контексте российского семейного права. Закон, (1), 77–86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Momotov, V.V. (2019). Bioethics in the Context of Law-Making and Law Enforcement (Surrogate Motherhood). Lex Russica, (1), 29–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.029-039</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чернова, Ж.В., Шпаковская, Л.Л. (2023). Путевка в жизнь: социологическое эссе об образовании, классовом неравенстве и социальном исключении в России. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NeJaime, D. (2015). Marriage equality and the new parenthood. Harvard Law Review, 5(129), 1185–1266. https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/1185-1266-Online.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dorfman, D. (2016). Surrogate parenthood: Between genetics and intent. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(2), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NeJaime, D. (2017). The Nature of Parenthood. Yale Law Journal, 126(8), 2260–2449. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2990640</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Douglas, T., Devolder, K. (2019). A conception of genetic parenthood. Bioethics, 33(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12493</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NeJaime, D. (2020). The Constitution of Parenthood. Stanford Law Review, 72, 261–380. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446018</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gostin, L.O. (2001). Surrogacy from the Perspectives of Economic and Civil Liberties. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 17(2), 429–431. Available at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1815</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nekrasova, E.V. (2019). Some Features of the Emergence of Parental Rights and Responsibilities in European Countries. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science, 5(71) (3), 294–298. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Horsey, K. (2017). Challenging presumptions: legal parenthood and surrogacy arrangements. In: Parental Rights and Responsibilities (pp. 287–312). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090085-15</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shultz, M. M. (1990). Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Wisconsin Law Review, (2), 297–398.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis, B.C. (2010). Three Lies and a Truth: Adjudicating Maternity in Surrogacy Disputes. Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 10-193. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1661921</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spiridonov, D.V., Polyakova, I.G. (2024). The Postponement of Childbearing and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Socio-economic and Demographic Aspects. Universe of Russia, 33(3), 75–98 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2024-33-3-75-98</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mills, C. (2021). Nuclear families: mitochondrial replacement techniques and the regulation of parenthood. Science, Technology, &amp; Human Values, 46(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920934542</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svitnev, K.N. (2008). Is a law on ART needed? Assisted reproductive technologies and their legal regulation. In: National identity of Russia and the demographic crisis. Materials of the II All-Russian Scientific Conference (Moscow, November 15, 2007) (pp. 819–825). Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert Publ. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">NeJaime, D. (2015). Marriage equality and the new parenthood. Harvard Law Review, 5(129), 1185– 1266. Available at: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/1185-1266-Online.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulianova, M.V. (2024). The Exercise of Family Rights and Performance of Obligations in the Structure of Family Legal Relations. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 1(63), 112–133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17072/1995‐4190‐2024‐63‐112‐133</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">NeJaime, D. (2017). The Nature of Parenthood. Yale Law Journal, 126(8), 2260–2449. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2990640</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Usacheva, E.A. (2019) Social fatherhood (motherhood): statement of the problem. Russian Juridical Journal, (6), 115–120. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">NeJaime, D. (2020). The Constitution of Parenthood. Stanford Law Review, 72, 261–380. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446018</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NeJaime, D. (2020). The Constitution of Parenthood. Stanford Law Review, 72, 261–380. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446018</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shultz, M.M. (1990). Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Wisconsin Law Review, (2), 297–398.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shultz, M.M. (1990). Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: an opportunity for gender neutrality. Wisconsin Law Review, (2), 297–398.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
