lexgenLex GeneticaLex Genetica3034-16393034-1647МГЮА10.17803/lexgen-2022-1-1-34-55lexgen-5Research ArticleСтатьиInternational legal issues on biosafety: general overviewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-7212GulyaevaE. E.

Associate Professor at International Law Department, Member of Russian Association of International Law, Member of European Association of International Law, Member of the Council for International Relations of the International Institute of Human Rights (IIDH - America), Member of Constitutional Council of Justice (Argentina)

gulya-eva@yandex.ruDiplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign AffairsRussian Federation202226122022113455Copyright © Gulyaeva E.E., 20222022Gulyaeva E.E.Gulyaeva E.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/5

Objective: The legal concept and content of biosafety is discussed in the context of International Law. Biosafety issues are enumerated as part of a definition of concrete aspects related to responsibility of the states for using biological weapons. The latest trends in international law on ensuring the international biosafety are analysed. Legal issues concerning the definition of a just war are discussed in terms of international humanitarian law, the issues of fundamental principles in current international law (the principle of necessity governing the use of force, the right of states to self-defence in case of a bioattack, the principle of the peaceful settlement of international disputes, the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states, arms control, and responsibility). The article presents an overview of new types of sovereignty such as biosovereignty, cyber sovereignty, and genomic sovereignty of states, along with the legal concept of international biocrime (genomocide), as well as classifications of bioterrorism, bioaggression, biopolitics and bioeconomics. Under current conditions, the importance of facilitating a broad interpretation of the concept of biosafety is emphasized.Methodology: The research uses general scientific and special cognitive techniques wherein legal analysis and synthesis, systemic, formal-legal, comparative-legal, historical-legal and dialectical methods are applied.Results: Despite the prohibition of biological weapons, urgent issues, such as establishing an international control mechanism for monitoring the non-proliferation of biological weapons, remain. Moreover, the Protocol to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), which entered into force in 1975, is yet to be fully adopted and / or ratified by all member states. Identifying certain types of biomedical research that should be banned according to generally accepted principles, the study concludes that the problem of banning these research activities has yet to be solved by some states. The concept of biosafety is interpreted broadly in terms of issues arising in relevant industrial processes. Biosecurity and biosafety are directly related to ensuring environmental security, marine security, food security and the security of outer space. Principles governing effective legal regulation for ensuring environmental, biological, and food safety are presented.

biosafetycyberbiosecuritymolecular weapongenomic sovereigntybiobankingbiocrimesgenomocidebioterrorismReferencesUSA PATRIOT Act (2001). Uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) act of 2001. Public Law 107–56, 107th Congress. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ocie/aml/patriotact2001.pdfUSA PATRIOT Act (2001). Uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) act of 2001. Public Law 107–56, 107th Congress. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ocie/aml/patriotact2001.pdfAnderson, K. & Jackson, L. A. (2003). Why are US and EU policies toward GMOs so different?. AgBioForum, 6(3), 95–100. Available at: https://agbioforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AgBioForum_6_3_95.pdfAnderson, K. & Jackson, L. A. (2003). Why are US and EU policies toward GMOs so different?. AgBioForum, 6(3), 95–100. Available at: https://agbioforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AgBioForum_6_3_95.pdfBioWeapons Prevention Project. (2014). BioWeapons Monitor. Available at: http://www.bwpp.org/documents/BWM%202014%20WEB.pdfBioWeapons Prevention Project. (2014). BioWeapons Monitor. Available at: http://www.bwpp.org/documents/BWM%202014%20WEB.pdfCampbell, M. L., Leonard, K., Primo, C. & Hewitt, C. L. (2018). Marine biosecurity crisis decision-making: two tools to aid “go”/“no go” decision-making. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00331Campbell, M. L., Leonard, K., Primo, C. & Hewitt, C. L. (2018). Marine biosecurity crisis decision-making: two tools to aid “go”/“no go” decision-making. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00331Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). (2006). Bioterrorism Overview. Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/44106/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). (2006). Bioterrorism Overview. Available at: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/44106/Council of Europe (1997). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.1997.0021Council of Europe (1997). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.1997.0021Denisenko, V. & Trikoz, E. (2020). Biopolitics and legal issues of emergency situations in the context of coronavirus pandemic. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 175. EDP Sciences, 14013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514013Denisenko, V. & Trikoz, E. (2020). Biopolitics and legal issues of emergency situations in the context of coronavirus pandemic. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 175. EDP Sciences, 14013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514013Denisenko, V. & Trikoz, E. (2020). Biopolitics and legal issues of emergency situations in the context of coronavirus pandemic. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 175, p. 14013). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514013Denisenko, V. & Trikoz, E. (2020). Biopolitics and legal issues of emergency situations in the context of coronavirus pandemic. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 175, p. 14013). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514013European Commission. (2003). Question and Answers on the regulation of GMOs in the EU (Memo/02/160-REV). Available at https://ruralcat.gencat.cat/documents/20181/126164/Question_answers_GMO_UE.pdf/e46523b3-9942-49da-a4d1-c07d83247bdfEuropean Commission. (2003). Question and Answers on the regulation of GMOs in the EU (Memo/02/160-REV). Available at https://ruralcat.gencat.cat/documents/20181/126164/Question_answers_GMO_UE.pdf/e46523b3-9942-49da-a4d1-c07d83247bdfOn Personal Data. Federal Law Russian Federation No. 152-FZ, July 27, 2006. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61801/. (In Russ.).On Personal Data. Federal Law Russian Federation No. 152-FZ, July 27, 2006. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61801/. (In Russ.).Fidler, D. P. (2020). Bioterrorism, public health, and international law. In: Bioterrorism: The History of a Crisis in American Society. Routledge, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003123644-41Fidler, D. P. (2020). Bioterrorism, public health, and international law. In: Bioterrorism: The History of a Crisis in American Society. Routledge, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003123644-41Galichet, C. & Taylor, G. (2021). Current capabilities for human genome editing: report for the WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing (No. WHO/SCI/RFH/2021.06). World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345330/WHO-SCI-RFH-2021.06-eng.pdf?sequence=1Galichet, C. & Taylor, G. (2021). Current capabilities for human genome editing: report for the WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing (No. WHO/SCI/RFH/2021.06). World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345330/WHO-SCI-RFH-2021.06-eng.pdf?sequence=1Gosstandart Rossii (1995). GOST Р 22.0.04-95. Safety in emergency situations. Biological and social emergencies. Terms and definitions. Available at: https://gostexpert.ru/gost/getDoc/45471 (In Russ.).Gosstandart Rossii (1995). GOST Р 22.0.04-95. Safety in emergency situations. Biological and social emergencies. Terms and definitions. Available at: https://gostexpert.ru/gost/getDoc/45471 (In Russ.).Gronvall, G. K. (2012). Preparing for Bioterrorism. UPMC. Available at: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2012/sloan_book/01-Front%20Matter_%20Preparing%20for%20Bioterrorism_GKGronvall_Dec2012.pdfGronvall, G. K. (2012). Preparing for Bioterrorism. UPMC. Available at: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2012/sloan_book/01-Front%20Matter_%20Preparing%20for%20Bioterrorism_GKGronvall_Dec2012.pdfKalinichenko, P. A. & Nekoteneva, M. V. (2020). Genomic sovereignty of developing countries: priorities of legal regulation. In: Geneticheskie tekhnologii i pravo v period stanovleniya bioekonomiki [Genetic technologies and law during the formation of bioeconomics]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 497–504. (In Russ.).Kalinichenko, P. A. & Nekoteneva, M. V. (2020). Genomic sovereignty of developing countries: priorities of legal regulation. In: Geneticheskie tekhnologii i pravo v period stanovleniya bioekonomiki [Genetic technologies and law during the formation of bioeconomics]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 497–504. (In Russ.).Kelsen, H. (1950). The draft declaration on rights and duties of states. American Journal of International Law, 44(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193756Kelsen, H. (1950). The draft declaration on rights and duties of states. American Journal of International Law, 44(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193756Krekora-Zając, D. (2020). Civil liability for damages related to germline and embryo editing against the legal admissibility of gene editing. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0399-2Krekora-Zając, D. (2020). Civil liability for damages related to germline and embryo editing against the legal admissibility of gene editing. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0399-2Kupferschmidt, К. (2016, August 16). Anthrax genome reveals secrets about a Soviet bioweapons accident. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah7194Kupferschmidt, К. (2016, August 16). Anthrax genome reveals secrets about a Soviet bioweapons accident. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah7194Levoshchenko, B. S. (2000). A new aspect in the international protection of human rights: ethics and biomedicine. RUDN Journal of Law, (2), 135–142. (In Russ.).Levoshchenko, B. S. (2000). A new aspect in the international protection of human rights: ethics and biomedicine. RUDN Journal of Law, (2), 135–142. (In Russ.).Lisitsyna, M. (2021, April 10). New types of specialties appeared in Russia with the award of academic degrees. RBC. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/10/04/2021/607167f39a794766130f7984?from=materials_on_subject. (In Russ.).Lisitsyna, M. (2021, April 10). New types of specialties appeared in Russia with the award of academic degrees. RBC. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/10/04/2021/607167f39a794766130f7984?from=materials_on_subject. (In Russ.).McElroy, R. J. (1991). The Geneva Protocol of 1925. In: The Politics of Arms Control Treaty Ratification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 125–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04534-8_4McElroy, R. J. (1991). The Geneva Protocol of 1925. In: The Politics of Arms Control Treaty Ratification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 125–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04534-8_4Merinova, O. A., Toporkov, A. V., Merinova, L. K., Antonova, E. V. & Viktorov, D. V. (2018). Biosafety: the analysis of the current system of specialist training in the Russian Federation. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology, (3), 5–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-2018-3-87-96Merinova, O. A., Toporkov, A. V., Merinova, L. K., Antonova, E. V. & Viktorov, D. V. (2018). Biosafety: the analysis of the current system of specialist training in the Russian Federation. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology, (3), 5–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-2018-3-87-96Merriam, E. (2014). The International Legal Regime Affecting Bioterrorism Prevention. National Security Law Journal, 3, 1.Merriam, E. (2014). The International Legal Regime Affecting Bioterrorism Prevention. National Security Law Journal, 3, 1.Montgomery, J. R. (2018, January). Modification of the human genome: Human rights challenges raised by scientific and technological developments. In: Proc. 20th Anniversary of the Oviedo Convention: relevance and challenges. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/20th-anniversary-of-the-oviedo-conventionMontgomery, J. R. (2018, January). Modification of the human genome: Human rights challenges raised by scientific and technological developments. In: Proc. 20th Anniversary of the Oviedo Convention: relevance and challenges. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/20th-anniversary-of-the-oviedo-conventionMurch, R. S., So, W. K., Buchholz, W. G., Raman, S. & Peccoud, J. (2018). Cyberbiosecurity: an emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00039Murch, R. S., So, W. K., Buchholz, W. G., Raman, S. & Peccoud, J. (2018). Cyberbiosecurity: an emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00039Nurton, J. (2020). Genetic scissors: at the cutting-edge of life. WIPO Magazine. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2020/04/article_0004.htmlNurton, J. (2020). Genetic scissors: at the cutting-edge of life. WIPO Magazine. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2020/04/article_0004.htmlPorges, A. (1994). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade-Multilateral Trade Negotiations (The Uruguay Round): Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations.International Legal Materials, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020782900027042Porges, A. (1994). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade-Multilateral Trade Negotiations (The Uruguay Round): Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations.International Legal Materials, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020782900027042Pratter, J. (1989). An Introduction to International Law. By Mark W. Janis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988. Pp. xvi. 299. International Journal of Legal Information, 17(1), 103–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500023143Pratter, J. (1989). An Introduction to International Law. By Mark W. Janis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988. Pp. xvi. 299. International Journal of Legal Information, 17(1), 103–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500023143Pravda.ru. (2001, December 6). The Producer of Anthrax Spores, Used by Terrorists. In the USA, Will Remain In The Shadow. Available at: https://english.pravda.ru/news/world/23473-n/Pravda.ru. (2001, December 6). The Producer of Anthrax Spores, Used by Terrorists. In the USA, Will Remain In The Shadow. Available at: https://english.pravda.ru/news/world/23473-n/Rae, G. (2019). Critiquing Sovereign Violence: Law, Biopolitics and Bio-Juridicalism. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474445283.001.0001Rae, G. (2019). Critiquing Sovereign Violence: Law, Biopolitics and Bio-Juridicalism. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474445283.001.0001European Commission (2014) Clinical trials - Regulation EU No 536/2014. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/clinical-trials/regulation_enEuropean Commission (2014) Clinical trials - Regulation EU No 536/2014. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/clinical-trials/regulation_enRichardson, L. C., Connell, N. D., Lewis, S. M., Pauwels, E. & Murch, R. S. (2019). Cyberbiosecurity: a call for cooperation in a new threat landscape. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099Richardson, L. C., Connell, N. D., Lewis, S. M., Pauwels, E. & Murch, R. S. (2019). Cyberbiosecurity: a call for cooperation in a new threat landscape. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099Rogers, A. & de Bousingen, D. D. (1995). Bioethics in Europe. Council of Europe.Rogers, A. & de Bousingen, D. D. (1995). Bioethics in Europe. Council of Europe.Tarasyants, E. V. (2011). International Protection and Promotion of Human Rights in Biomedical Research. Moscow: BI Publ. (In Russ.).Tarasyants, E. V. (2011). International Protection and Promotion of Human Rights in Biomedical Research. Moscow: BI Publ. (In Russ.).ICPO-INTERPOL (1956). ICPO-INTERPOL Constitution, adopted by the General Assembly at its 25th session. Vienna. Available at: https://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/14/14-02/interpol-constitution.xmlICPO-INTERPOL (1956). ICPO-INTERPOL Constitution, adopted by the General Assembly at its 25th session. Vienna. Available at: https://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/14/14-02/interpol-constitution.xmlTrikoz E. N., Mustafina-Bredihina D. M., & Guljaeva E. E. (2021). Legal regulation of the gene editing procedure: foreign experience. RUDN Bulletin, 25(1), 67–86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-1-67-86Trikoz E. N., Mustafina-Bredihina D. M., & Guljaeva E. E. (2021). Legal regulation of the gene editing procedure: foreign experience. RUDN Bulletin, 25(1), 67–86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-1-67-86Trikoz, E. & Gulyaeva, E. (2021). Ecological cases of the ECtHR and the environmental risk of GMO. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 244. EDP Sciences, 12024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124412024Trikoz, E. & Gulyaeva, E. (2021). Ecological cases of the ECtHR and the environmental risk of GMO. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 244. EDP Sciences, 12024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124412024Trikoz, E., Gulyaeva, E., & Belyaev, K. (2020). Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 224. EDP Sciences, 03005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022403005Trikoz, E., Gulyaeva, E., & Belyaev, K. (2020). Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI. In: E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 224. EDP Sciences, 03005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022403005United Nations (2004). Resolution 1540 (2004). Adopted by the Security Council at its 4956th meeting, on 28 April 2004. Available at: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/S_RES_15402004_E.pdfUnited Nations (2004). Resolution 1540 (2004). Adopted by the Security Council at its 4956th meeting, on 28 April 2004. Available at: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/S_RES_15402004_E.pdfUnited Nations (2011). Resolution 1977 (2011). Adopted by the Security Council at its 6518th meeting, on 20 April 2011. Available at: https://www.vertic.org/media/assets/nim_docs/Treaty/resolutions/UNSCR1977_EN.pdf.United Nations (2011). Resolution 1977 (2011). Adopted by the Security Council at its 6518th meeting, on 20 April 2011. Available at: https://www.vertic.org/media/assets/nim_docs/Treaty/resolutions/UNSCR1977_EN.pdf.Zunder, S. (2008). Die Bedrohung durch den Bioterrorismus und das Management „biologischer Gefahrenlagen“ in Deutschland. Masterarbeit [The threat of bioterrorism and the management of ‘biological hazards’ in Germany. Master Thesis]. Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg. Available at: https://reposit.haw-hamburg.de/handle/20.500.12738/8213. (German).Zunder, S. (2008). Die Bedrohung durch den Bioterrorismus und das Management „biologischer Gefahrenlagen“ in Deutschland. Masterarbeit [The threat of bioterrorism and the management of ‘biological hazards’ in Germany. Master Thesis]. Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg. Available at: https://reposit.haw-hamburg.de/handle/20.500.12738/8213. (German).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.