lexgenLex GeneticaLex Genetica3034-16393034-1647МГЮА10.17803/lexgen-2024-3-3-44-61lexgen-43Research ArticleLex Genetica: сравнительно-правовые исследованияLex Genetica: Comparative Legal AnalysisНейроправа: время обсудить право на конфиденциальность и психическую неприкосновенностьNeurorights: Time to Discuss Rights to Mental Privacy and Integrityhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-3235ФаринеллаФ.FarinellaF.

Фавио Фаринелла, директор исследовательского центра 

Буэнос-Айрес

Favio Farinella, Director of the Research Centre of International Law

 Buenos Aires

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2708-8332ГуляеваЕ. Е.GulyaevaE. E.

Елена Е. Гуляева, кандидат юридических наук. доцент кафедры международного права

Москва

Elena E. Gulyaeva, Candidate of Science (Law), Associate Professor of the International Law Department

Moscow

gulya-eva@yandex.ruНациональный университет Мар-дель-ПлатаMar del Plata National UniversityДипломатическая академия МИД РоссииDiplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Af fairs of the Russian Federation202424102024334461Copyright © Фаринелла Ф., Гуляева Е.Е., 20242024Фаринелла Ф., Гуляева Е.Е.Farinella F., Gulyaeva E.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/43

Статья представляет собой научное исследование и направлена на описание того, каким образом искусственный интеллект, алгоритмы и глубокое обучение влияют на основные права человека, такие как конфиденциальность и целостность. Авторы оценивают состояние текущей защиты рассматриваемых прав на международном уровне, уделяя особое внимание российскому и европейскому законодательствам. Авторы также анализируют, представляет ли ИИ новую угрозу защите прав и, как следствие, должны ли быть признаны новые права в списке основных прав и свобод человека для борьбы с этими нарушениями. Авторами используется качественный метод исследования, чтобы понять убеждения, опыт, отношения, поведение и взаимодействие людей с социальными сетями и искусственным интеллектом. Авторы используют источники международного и внутригосударственного права. Результаты имеют значение для новых мер по обеспечению благополучия, которые учитывают взаимосвязь между интернетом и искусственным интеллектом в отношении конфиденциальности и психической целостности личности. В статье делается попытка оценить, нуждается ли право на неприкосновенность частной жизни в какой-либо специальной защите в эпоху искусственного интеллекта, и если да, то что мы подразумеваем под правами на ментальную (психическую) неприкосновенность и целостность?

The aim of this paper is to describe how artificial intelligence, algorithms, and deep learning can influence fundamental rights such as privacy and integrity. The authors consider the current protection of these rights the international level with a focus on Russian and European legislation. The authors also discuss whether AI poses a new threat to the protection of fundamental rights, and whether new laws should be established to deal with those violations. The study involves qualitative research methods, aimed at understanding people’s beliefs, experience, attitudes, behaviour, their interactions with social media and AI, as well as the analysis of sources of international and domestic law. The results have implications for new well-being interventions which look at the relationship between the internet and AI and their influence on individual privacy and mental integrity. The authors attempt to evaluate whether the right to privacy requires any special protection in the age of artificial intelligence, and if so, what do we mean by rights to mental privacy and integrity?

права человеканеприкосновенность частной жизнипсихическая неприкосновенностьправовое нарушениенейроправоhuman rightsprivacymental integritylegal disruption“neurolaw”ReferencesAbashidze, A.K., Abdalla, I.A. (2000). The Arab Charter of Human Rights. Pravovedenie, (1), 196–200. (In Russ.).Abashidze, A.K., Abdalla, I.A. (2000). The Arab Charter of Human Rights. Pravovedenie, (1), 196–200. (In Russ.).Angwin, J., Larson, J. (2022). Bias in criminal risk scores is mathematically inevitable, researchers say. In: Ethics of Data and Analytics (pp. 265–267). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-38Angwin, J., Larson, J. (2022). Bias in criminal risk scores is mathematically inevitable, researchers say. In: Ethics of Data and Analytics (pp. 265–267). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-38Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P. (2013). Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798–1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2013.50Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P. (2013). Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798–1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2013.50Bringas, S., Salomón, S., Duque, R., Lage, C., Montaña, J.L. (2020). Alzheimer’s Disease stage identification using deep learning models. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 109, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103514Bringas, S., Salomón, S., Duque, R., Lage, C., Montaña, J.L. (2020). Alzheimer’s Disease stage identification using deep learning models. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 109, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103514Bublitz, J.C., Merkel, R. (2014). Crimes against minds: On mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8, 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9172-yBublitz, J.C., Merkel, R. (2014). Crimes against minds: On mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8, 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9172-yBublitz, J.C. (2013). My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept. In: Hildt, E., Franke, A. (eds). Cognitive Enhancement. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance (pp. 233–264). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_19Bublitz, J.C. (2013). My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept. In: Hildt, E., Franke, A. (eds). Cognitive Enhancement. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance (pp. 233–264). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_19Douglas, T., Forsberg, L. (2021). Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity. In: Ligthart, S., van Toor, D., Kooijmans, T., Douglas, T., Meynen, G. (eds). Neurolaw. Advances in Neuroscience, Justice & Security (pp. 179–201). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69277-3_8Douglas, T., Forsberg, L. (2021). Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity. In: Ligthart, S., van Toor, D., Kooijmans, T., Douglas, T., Meynen, G. (eds). Neurolaw. Advances in Neuroscience, Justice & Security (pp. 179–201). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69277-3_8Ebzeyev, B.S. (1982). Constitutional bases of individual freedom in the USSRr. Saratov: Saratov State University. (In Russ.).Ebzeyev, B.S. (1982). Constitutional bases of individual freedom in the USSRr. Saratov: Saratov State University. (In Russ.).Glannon, W. (2009). Stimulating brains, altering minds. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(5), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.027789Glannon, W. (2009). Stimulating brains, altering minds. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(5), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.027789Goering, S., Klein, E., Specker Sullivan, L., Wexler, A., Agüera y Arcas, B., Bi, G., ... Yuste, R. (2021). Recommendations for responsible development and application of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics, 14(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6Goering, S., Klein, E., Specker Sullivan, L., Wexler, A., Agüera y Arcas, B., Bi, G., ... Yuste, R. (2021). Recommendations for responsible development and application of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics, 14(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6Ienca, M., Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1Ienca, M., Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1Johnson, L.S.M., Rommelfanger, K.S. (eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708652Johnson, L.S.M., Rommelfanger, K.S. (eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708652Jwa, A.S., Poldrack, R.A. (2022). Addressing privacy risk in neuroscience data: from data protection to harm prevention. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(2), lsac025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac025Jwa, A.S., Poldrack, R.A. (2022). Addressing privacy risk in neuroscience data: from data protection to harm prevention. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(2), lsac025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac025Kapustin, A.Ya. (2010). Some Issues of Methodological Research of the Category Global Civil Society in International Law. Pravovedenie, (1), 71–83. (In Russ.).Kapustin, A.Ya. (2010). Some Issues of Methodological Research of the Category Global Civil Society in International Law. Pravovedenie, (1), 71–83. (In Russ.).Kashirkina, A.A., Morozov, A.N. (2019). Examination of International Acts Draf ts: New Facets of Legal Expertise. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 233–254. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17-323/2072-8166.2019.2.233.254Kashirkina, A.A., Morozov, A.N. (2019). Examination of International Acts Draf ts: New Facets of Legal Expertise. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (2), 233–254. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17-323/2072-8166.2019.2.233.254Lavazza, A. (2018). Freedom of thought and mental integrity: The moral requirements for any neural prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00082Lavazza, A. (2018). Freedom of thought and mental integrity: The moral requirements for any neural prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00082Lavazza, A., Giorgi, R. (2023). Philosophical foundation of the right to mental integrity in the age of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics, 16(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09517-2Lavazza, A., Giorgi, R. (2023). Philosophical foundation of the right to mental integrity in the age of neurotechnologies. Neuroethics, 16(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09517-2Matuzov, N.I., Malko, A.V. (2001). Theory of State and Law: A Course of Lectures. Moscow: Yurist Publ. (In Russ.).Matuzov, N.I., Malko, A.V. (2001). Theory of State and Law: A Course of Lectures. Moscow: Yurist Publ. (In Russ.).Miroshnikova, V.A. (2004). Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurkniga Publ. (In Russ.).Miroshnikova, V.A. (2004). Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurkniga Publ. (In Russ.).Moens, J. (2024, April 17). Your brain waves are up for sale. A new law wants to change that. The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/science/colorado-braindata-privacy.htmlMoens, J. (2024, April 17). Your brain waves are up for sale. A new law wants to change that. The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/science/colorado-braindata-privacy.htmlNieto-Reyes, A., Duque, R., Montaña, J.L., Lage, C. (2017). Classification of Alzheimer’s patients through ubiquitous computing. Sensors, 17(7), 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071679Nieto-Reyes, A., Duque, R., Montaña, J.L., Lage, C. (2017). Classification of Alzheimer’s patients through ubiquitous computing. Sensors, 17(7), 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071679Nikitin, D.A. (2005). Constitutional and legal foundations of personal security in the Russian Federation [Dissertation]. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law. (In Russ.).Nikitin, D.A. (2005). Constitutional and legal foundations of personal security in the Russian Federation [Dissertation]. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law. (In Russ.).Noy, I.S. (1965). Theoretical issues of deprivation of liberty. Saratov: Saratov State University. (In Russ.).Noy, I.S. (1965). Theoretical issues of deprivation of liberty. Saratov: Saratov State University. (In Russ.).Ochang, P., Eke, D., Stahl, B.C. (2024). Perceptions on the Ethical and Legal Principles that Influence Global Brain Data Governance. Neuroethics, 17(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09558-1Ochang, P., Eke, D., Stahl, B.C. (2024). Perceptions on the Ethical and Legal Principles that Influence Global Brain Data Governance. Neuroethics, 17(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09558-1Orlova, O.V. (2007). Legal freedom of the individual in civil society. Journal of Russian Law, (5), 76–83. (In Russ.).Orlova, O.V. (2007). Legal freedom of the individual in civil society. Journal of Russian Law, (5), 76–83. (In Russ.).Semeshko, A.I., Sukhanova, M.G. (2021). The right to mental integrity of a person: definition of the concept in the context of international law regulation. Perm Legal Almanac, (4), 162–174. (In Russ.).Semeshko, A.I., Sukhanova, M.G. (2021). The right to mental integrity of a person: definition of the concept in the context of international law regulation. Perm Legal Almanac, (4), 162–174. (In Russ.).Sommaggio, P., Mazzocca, M. (2020). Cognitive Liberty and Human Rights. In: D’Aloia, A., Errigo, M.C. (eds). Neuroscience and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38840-9_6Sommaggio, P., Mazzocca, M. (2020). Cognitive Liberty and Human Rights. In: D’Aloia, A., Errigo, M.C. (eds). Neuroscience and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38840-9_6Stanley, J. (2012, August 29). High-Tech “Mind Readers” are Latest Ef fort to Detect Lies. ACLU. Available at https://www.aclu.org/blog/high-tech-mind-readers-are-latest-ef fort-detect-liesStanley, J. (2012, August 29). High-Tech “Mind Readers” are Latest Ef fort to Detect Lies. ACLU. Available at https://www.aclu.org/blog/high-tech-mind-readers-are-latest-ef fort-detect-liesSundurov, F.R., (1980). Deprivation of liberty and socio-psychological prerequisites for its ef fectiveness. Kazan: Kazan University. (In Russ.).Sundurov, F.R., (1980). Deprivation of liberty and socio-psychological prerequisites for its ef fectiveness. Kazan: Kazan University. (In Russ.).Tesink, V., Douglas, T., Forsberg, L., Ligthart, S., Meynen, G. (2024). Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 109645. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109645Tesink, V., Douglas, T., Forsberg, L., Ligthart, S., Meynen, G. (2024). Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 109645. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109645Travieso, J.A. (2019). En busca de la privacidad perdida. La Ley, 83(56). (In Span.).Travieso, J.A. (2019). En busca de la privacidad perdida. La Ley, 83(56). (In Span.).Varlamova, N.V. (2009). Human rights as a subject of legal interpretation. State and Law, (2), 24–29. (In Russ.).Varlamova, N.V. (2009). Human rights as a subject of legal interpretation. State and Law, (2), 24–29. (In Russ.).Von Solms, B., Von Solms, R. (2018). Cybersecurity and information security–what goes where? Information & Computer Security, 26(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2017-0025Von Solms, B., Von Solms, R. (2018). Cybersecurity and information security–what goes where? Information & Computer Security, 26(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-04-2017-0025Wolpe, P.R. (2009). Is my mind mine? Neuroethics and brain imaging. In: Ravitsky, V., Fiester, A., Caplan, A.L. (eds.) The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (pp. 86–93). New York: Springer Publishing Co. Available at: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/953170Wolpe, P.R. (2009). Is my mind mine? Neuroethics and brain imaging. In: Ravitsky, V., Fiester, A., Caplan, A.L. (eds.) The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (pp. 86–93). New York: Springer Publishing Co. Available at: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/953170World Health Organisation. (2022, June 8). Mental disorders. Available at https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disordersWorld Health Organisation. (2022, June 8). Mental disorders. Available at https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.