lexgenLex GeneticaLex Genetica3034-16393034-1647МГЮА10.17803/lexgen-2022-1-1-20-33lexgen-4Research ArticleСтатьиGenetic Knowledge: a Gift or a Curse?https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-3732PrzhilenskiyV. I.

Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology

viprzhilenskij@msal.ruKutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Russian Federation202226122022112033Copyright © Przhilenskiy V.I., 20222022Przhilenskiy V.I.Przhilenskiy V.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/4

The origins of genetic research in the molecular era are discussed along with the prospects for development of the system of the values underlying their legal regulation. Heredity and variability are included into a historically defined worldview as socially significant values respectively occupying alternate leading positions in archaic and modern societies. The article substantiates a connection between ideas about heredity and variability and the social structure, institutions and social practices of the two main types of the pre-molecular era societies. The article also discusses the significance of pre-scientific ideas concerning blood as a special substance ensuring biological, social and legal inheritance in the system of social action of the archaic society. Analysis is given to the conceptual foundations of the strategy of overcoming the ‘right of blood’ in modern societies, where the value of heredity is replaced by the value of variability to serve as a value-system basis for development and progress. Examples of coexisting worldviews and values inherent in both archaic and modern forms that still interact in present-day societies are presented and generalized. The example of the parascientific blood-type theory prevalent in today’s Japan is used to illustrate the ability of collective consciousness to integrate scientific ideas into deep underlying layers of pre-scientific thinking. The postmodern mixture of worldviews and values gives rise to ambiguity and uncertainty with regard to values in the era of discovery of the genetic mechanism of inheritance, creating additional difficulties for rule-makers (legislators) in course of forming a system for the legal regulation of genetic research. Finding a balance between prohibitions and permissions in the corpus of laws and by-laws regulating genetic knowledge development is all the more important given that the demarcation between representing and intervening in the research carried out by molecular biologists is losing its certainty (definiteness) even faster than in the physics of the microworld, let alone other subject areas of the modern science. Bioethics, which is currently providing a philosophical basis for the legal regulation of genetic research, requires theoretical elaboration and conceptualization. As one of the substantiation options, the article proposes the concept of supplementing instrumental rationality with social communication put forward by Jürgen Habermas within the framework of his theory of communicative action

human genomevalueslegal regulationheredityvariabilityinterferenceReferencesAndo, J., Ono, Y., Yoshimura, K., Onoda, N., Shinohara, M., Kanba, S. & Asai, M. (2002). The genetic structure of Cloninger's seven-factor model of temperament and character in a Japanese sample. Journal of Personality, 70(5), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05018Ando, J., Ono, Y., Yoshimura, K., Onoda, N., Shinohara, M., Kanba, S. & Asai, M. (2002). The genetic structure of Cloninger's seven-factor model of temperament and character in a Japanese sample. Journal of Personality, 70(5), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05018The New English Bible. The New Testament. (1970). Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press.The New English Bible. The New Testament. (1970). Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press.The Nuremberg Code (1947). BMJ (1996), 313(7070), 1448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448The Nuremberg Code (1947). BMJ (1996), 313(7070), 1448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448Cassirer, E. (2004). Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya [The Philosophy of the Enlightenment]. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).Cassirer, E. (2004). Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya [The Philosophy of the Enlightenment]. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN).Diderot, D. (1986). Sochineniya. Chast' 1 [Works. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Myslʹ.Diderot, D. (1986). Sochineniya. Chast' 1 [Works. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Myslʹ.Habermas, J. (2007). The Theory of Communicative Action (extracts). Voprosy social'noi teorii, 1(1), 229–245. Available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/vst/2007/habermas.pdf. (Accessed 17.08.2021). (In Russ.).Habermas, J. (2007). The Theory of Communicative Action (extracts). Voprosy social'noi teorii, 1(1), 229–245. Available at: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/vst/2007/habermas.pdf. (Accessed 17.08.2021). (In Russ.).Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814563Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814563Kojima, S., Kamada, A. J. & Parrish, N. F. (2021). Virus-derived variation in diverse human genomes. PLoS Genetics, 17(4), e1009324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009324Kojima, S., Kamada, A. J. & Parrish, N. F. (2021). Virus-derived variation in diverse human genomes. PLoS Genetics, 17(4), e1009324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009324Kozyrev, F. N. (2015). Are equality and liberty Christian values? Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 16(3), 123–124. (In Russ.).Kozyrev, F. N. (2015). Are equality and liberty Christian values? Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 16(3), 123–124. (In Russ.).Lévi-Strauss, C. (2001). Structural Anthropology. Moscow: ĖKSMO-Press. (In Russ.).Lévi-Strauss, C. (2001). Structural Anthropology. Moscow: ĖKSMO-Press. (In Russ.).Lysenko, T. D. (2001). Heredity and its variability. The Minerva Group, Inc.Lysenko, T. D. (2001). Heredity and its variability. The Minerva Group, Inc.McGuire, A. L., Gabriel, S., Tishkoff, S. A., Wonkam, A., Chakravarti, A., Furlong, E. E., et al. (2020). The road ahead in genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21(10), 581– 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0272-6McGuire, A. L., Gabriel, S., Tishkoff, S. A., Wonkam, A., Chakravarti, A., Furlong, E. E., et al. (2020). The road ahead in genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21(10), 581– 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0272-6Moraes, F. & Góes, A. (2016). A decade of human genome project conclusion: Scientific diffusion about our genome knowledge. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20952Moraes, F. & Góes, A. (2016). A decade of human genome project conclusion: Scientific diffusion about our genome knowledge. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20952Nakamine, K. (2017, April 4). Japanese blood types: and what they say about your personality. Tofugu. Available at: https://www.tofugu.com/japan/japanese-blood-type/. (Accessed 06.05.2021).Nakamine, K. (2017, April 4). Japanese blood types: and what they say about your personality. Tofugu. Available at: https://www.tofugu.com/japan/japanese-blood-type/. (Accessed 06.05.2021).Noman, A., Aqeel, M. & He, S. (2016). CRISPR-Cas9: tool for qualitative and quantitative plant genome editing. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01740Noman, A., Aqeel, M. & He, S. (2016). CRISPR-Cas9: tool for qualitative and quantitative plant genome editing. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01740Nowotny, H. & Testa, G. (2011). Naked genes: Reinventing the human in the molecular age. Mit Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014939.001.0001Nowotny, H. & Testa, G. (2011). Naked genes: Reinventing the human in the molecular age. Mit Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014939.001.0001Rabinow, P. (1992). Studies in the Anthropology of Reason. Anthropology Today, 8(5), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2783568Rabinow, P. (1992). Studies in the Anthropology of Reason. Anthropology Today, 8(5), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2783568Regalado, А. (2018, November 25). Exclusive: Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/11/25/138962/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/Regalado, А. (2018, November 25). Exclusive: Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/11/25/138962/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/Shapiro, J. & Noble, D. (2021). What prevents mainstream evolutionists teaching the whole truth about how genomes evolve? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 165, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.04.004Shapiro, J. & Noble, D. (2021). What prevents mainstream evolutionists teaching the whole truth about how genomes evolve? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 165, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.04.004Shenk, D. (2011). The genius in all of us: New insights into genetics, talent, and IQ. Anchor.Shenk, D. (2011). The genius in all of us: New insights into genetics, talent, and IQ. Anchor.Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.28Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.28Sophocles. (1990). Dramy [Dramas]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).Sophocles. (1990). Dramy [Dramas]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).UNESCO. (1997). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. Article 6. The General Assembly of the United Nations endorsed the UNESCO Declaration in Dec. 1998. United Nations Press Release GA/9532. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000110220_rus.page=61UNESCO. (1997). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. Article 6. The General Assembly of the United Nations endorsed the UNESCO Declaration in Dec. 1998. United Nations Press Release GA/9532. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000110220_rus.page=61Zhang, F., Wen, Y. & Guo, X. (2014). CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R40–R46. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu125Zhang, F., Wen, Y. & Guo, X. (2014). CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R40–R46. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu125

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.