lexgenLex GeneticaLex Genetica3034-16393034-1647МГЮА10.17803/lexgen-2024-3-1-57-67lexgen-26Research ArticleLex Genetica: сравнительно-правовые исследованияLex Genetica: Comparative Legal AnalysisТехнико-экономическое обоснование взаимного признания географических обозначений сельскохозяйственной продукции между Китаем и РоссиейFeasibility Research on Mutual Recognition of Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products between China and RussiaЧонгФенгChongFeng

Фенг Чонг, юридический факультет

Пекин

Feng Chong, Faculty of Law

Beijing

fengchong422@163.comКитайский сельскохозяйственный университетBeijing University of Agriculture202403052024315767Copyright © Чонг Ф., 20242024Чонг Ф.Chong F.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://lexgen.msal.ru/jour/article/view/26

Китай и Россия являются крупными производителями разнообразной сельскохозяйственной продукции. Однако их глобальное влияние на сельскохозяйственную отрасль по-прежнему существенно отстает от стран ЕС.Учитывая соглашение между Китаем и ЕС о географических обозначениях и быстрый рост китайско-российской торговли, для Китая и России крайне важно обсудить взаимное признание географических обозначений для сельскохозяйственной продукции. Потенциальное сотрудничество в этой области направлено на содействие импорту и экспорту сельскохозяйственной продукции между Китаем и Россией, повышение конкурентоспособности этой продукции на международном рынке. Однако нарушение баланса между импортом и экспортом сельскохозяйственной продукции, а также различия в торговых системах и законодательстве о географических обозначениях сделают взаимное признание географических обозначений более сложным. Китай и Россия могли бы рассмотреть «пакетные договоренности», основанные на их собственных многосторонних торговых системах, начиная с взаимного признания некоторых географических обозначений для сельскохозяйственных продуктов.

While China and Russia are both major agricultural producers, their influence on the global agricultural industry still lags significantly behind EU countries. Considering the recent China-EU Agreement on Geographical Indications (CEAGI) and the rapid current growth of China-Russia trade, it becomes crucial for China and Russia to discuss the mutual recognition of geographical indications (GIs) for agricultural products. The potential for cooperation in this area consists in promoting import and export trade of agricultural products between China and Russia, thus enhancing the competitiveness of these products in the international market. However, challenges in the mutual recognition of GIs arise due to imbalances in the trade of agricultural products, as well as differences in trading systems and current legislation on geographical indications. A feasible package arrangement could involve mutual recognition of some GIs for agricultural products based on existing Chinese and Russia multilateral trading systems.

КитайРоссиягеографические обозначениявзаимное признаниесельскохозяйственная продукцияChinaRussiageographical indicationsmutual recognitionagricultural productsReferencesGiovannucci, D., Josling, T.E., Kerr, W.A., O’Connor, B., Yeung, M.T. (2009). Guide to geographical indications: Linking products and their origins (summary). SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1736713. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736713Giovannucci, D., Josling, T.E., Kerr, W.A., O’Connor, B., Yeung, M.T. (2009). Guide to geographical indications: Linking products and their origins (summary). SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1736713. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736713Moir, H.V.J. (2017). Understanding EU Trade Policy on Geographical Indications. 12th Annual epip Conference: Claims on Area: The geography-IP interface, University of Bordeaux, 4-6 September 2017. SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3299714. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3299714Moir, H.V.J. (2017). Understanding EU Trade Policy on Geographical Indications. 12th Annual epip Conference: Claims on Area: The geography-IP interface, University of Bordeaux, 4-6 September 2017. SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3299714. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3299714Pezoldt, K., Mikheeva, E.A., Koval, A.G., Gubina, M. A. (2022). Protection of Geographical Indications in International Trade: Prospects for Russia. Economy of regions, 18(3), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-18Pezoldt, K., Mikheeva, E.A., Koval, A.G., Gubina, M. A. (2022). Protection of Geographical Indications in International Trade: Prospects for Russia. Economy of regions, 18(3), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-18Prud'homme, D., Zhang, T. (2019). China’s intellectual property regime for innovation. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10404-7Prud'homme, D., Zhang, T. (2019). China’s intellectual property regime for innovation. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10404-7Qian, W., Dong, Y., Liu, Y. (2023). The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02168-xQian, W., Dong, Y., Liu, Y. (2023). The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02168-xSimanjuntak, Y.N. (2021). The Review of Communal Rights on Geographical Indications: Communal Standpoint as Constraints to Legal Protection. Environmental Policy and Law, 51(5), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-210001Simanjuntak, Y.N. (2021). The Review of Communal Rights on Geographical Indications: Communal Standpoint as Constraints to Legal Protection. Environmental Policy and Law, 51(5), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-210001Song, X. (2018). The role played by the regime of collective and certification marks in the protection of geographical indications—Comparative study of law and practice in France, the EU and China. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 21(5-6), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12111Song, X. (2018). The role played by the regime of collective and certification marks in the protection of geographical indications—Comparative study of law and practice in France, the EU and China. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 21(5-6), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12111Song, X. (2021). The Protection of Geographical Indications in China: Challenges of Adopting the European Approach. Kluwer Law International. Xiaobing, W., Kireeva, I. (2007). Protection of geographical indications in China: conflicts, causes and solutions. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 10(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00315.xSong, X. (2021). The Protection of Geographical Indications in China: Challenges of Adopting the European Approach. Kluwer Law International. Xiaobing, W., Kireeva, I. (2007). Protection of geographical indications in China: conflicts, causes and solutions. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 10(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00315.xYang, C., Song, R., Ding, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Li, H. (2022). Review on Legal Supervision System of the Chinese Wine Industry. Horticulturae, 8(5), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050432Yang, C., Song, R., Ding, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Li, H. (2022). Review on Legal Supervision System of the Chinese Wine Industry. Horticulturae, 8(5), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8050432Zappalaglio, A. (2021). The transformation of EU geographical indications law: the present, past and future of the origin link. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330476Zappalaglio, A. (2021). The transformation of EU geographical indications law: the present, past and future of the origin link. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330476Zappalaglio, A., Mikheeva, E. (2021) The new Russian Law of Geographical Indications: a critical assessment. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(4-5), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab017Zappalaglio, A., Mikheeva, E. (2021) The new Russian Law of Geographical Indications: a critical assessment. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(4-5), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab017Zhu, Y. (2018). Solutions to Overseas Protection of China’s Geographical Indications. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(10), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.610012Zhu, Y. (2018). Solutions to Overseas Protection of China’s Geographical Indications. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(10), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.610012

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.